Opinionista
Brendah Nyakudya
Nelson Mandela and the inevitability of death

The autopsy painting of Nelson Mandela by artist Yiull Damaso evoked much anger and shock. Statements such as “speaking of his death is taboo and seen as disrespectful in South Africa because of his iconic stature” were thrown around. We all shall die (except, perhaps, Robert Mugabe), so what level of deity must one achieve to have the subject of your death become taboo? What is with the almost cult-like obsession with Mandela and why is the subject of his death so unmentionable?

It’s clear the part that Nelson Mandela played in the struggle for freedom is not to be taken lightly and should be respected. But other unsung struggle heroes also played a role, and yet have never had the honour of receiving even a sliver of the exaltation given to Mandela. Someone summed it up perfectly on Facebook by stating that: “We must educate the public that Mandela was only the face of the campaign against apartheid. We must honour all struggle heroes: Sisulu, Tambo, Mbeki, Sobukwe, Biko, etc. To elevate Mandela above all other struggle heroes is to insult their memory and the contribution they made.” Many of these men played, in my humble opinion, an even greater role than Mandela, yet their contributions are overlooked due to this unnaturally commercial phenomenon of hero-worship.

This Mandela-mania has somehow distorted history by making it appear as if Mandela single-handedly saved the country and its people, ensuring peace on earth ever after. Please note this is neither an accusation nor blame-placing: this hero-worshiping behaviour probably wasn’t of his doing or orchestrating. Instead, it was started and fuelled by those who were guilty of apartheid atrocities and felt eternally grateful for his message of reconciliation. But surely those that benefited from his stance should show appreciation to all the black people of South Africa. They are the ones who bought into and acted out the message of peace, thereby extending a hand of forgiveness. It wasn’t about one man. Failing to recognise this is short-sighted and leads to feelings of resentment from a people that still feel unappreciated after having bent over backwards to accommodate when they could have shunned and killed in revenge.

Why is the subject of his death so taboo? Is it the grief of losing Mandela that grips us or the fear of a South Africa without him that cripples us? I believe it’s both but more the latter. There seems to be an unspoken fear and dread that when the great man is gone everything will fall apart and the hope and goodwill he preached will die with him. Some white people fear reconciliation will be reversed and they will be murdered in the streets. Some black people fear anarchy will prevail at the hands of those that have taken over.

For as long as I remember, Mandela has been used as a say-the-word-and-all-will-be-well figure, nation-rallying device and some special type of superhero glue that has been magically holding society together. I, personally, have never understood the need to base the country’s hopes, dreams and self-esteem at the feet of one man. It’s unreasonable and unfair. For any project to have validity or be taken seriously it has to have the name Nelson Mandela before it. Charity and reconciliation are tied to Mandela’s name to evoke emotions, mostly guilt, designed to push people to philanthropic action. That is not sustainable. In the words of Damaso: “Nelson Mandela is a great man, but he’s just a man... The eventual passing of Mr Mandela is something that we will have to face, as individuals, as a nation.” With this in mind, would it not be wiser to have a culture that is constantly searching and loudly celebrating various people in society? All those who have values capturing the spirit that we so desperately need? I don’t believe a country should be defined by one individual.

South Africa and its people have so much going for it that it should have a very healthy sense of belief in its own ability to bring about hope for its future without needing an occasion (the World Cup) or a human icon. This country should be defined by a belief in itself and its people – a belief that the values and principles Mandela embodies are in each and every one of us. We should all be able to show and live out these characteristics. That way we contribute to an ongoing process that showcases the best of South Africa the country, not just Nelson Mandela the man. If we do this, when he passes on there will not be a gaping void that can’t be filled.

South Africans should be taking care of each other, loving each other and forgiving each other every day without needing provocation, motivation or a “67 minutes” catchphrase. That is what builds a country’s lasting legacy.

More by Brendah Nyakudya




You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please login or sign up.
So well said, Brendah. I too have been saying for a long while that while some things may change once the man has passed on (voting patterns, perhaps?), the country will continue to exist - and I don't think it will fall to pieces, as some would suggest. Again, well written.
Brandah you say "Instead, it was started and fuelled by those who were guilty of apartheid atrocities and felt eternally grateful for his message of reconciliation"

Mandela was an icon while in jail, it is wrong to suggest that this was perpetuated by those who are great full of message of reconciliation. I am not sure where do you get the sense that Mandela's death is a taboo, its discussion on South African lips every time, we accept that he is old and may not be with us for a long time.
We are not gripped by fear of his death as you suggest Mandela has withdrawn completely out of public life exception attending celebratory occasions if necessary. Mandela like Lincoln will remain our symbol of hope, peace and prosperity.

The outrage I experience is of an autopsy being performed on a living person, literally and metaphorically speaking . It is tasteless.

What makes this painting a 'Work of Art', what makes Yiull Damaso an artist ? Will this piece of amateurish dabbling still be relevant 20 years hence ? Bad painting is tasteless and an unfinished bad painting not worthy of a nationwide debate. There are better ways to honour the living.
In a sense Nelson Mandela did single-handedly save South Africa. The irony is that he had to do very little to achieve this.

Mandela may just be a man, but while he was in jail the rest of the world turned him into an icon, a symbol of the fight against apartheid and human rights. It was this symbol that led us through the massacres, the bombings and political brinkmanship that preceded South Africa's first democratic elections.

The painting of Mandela's autopsy is tantamount to burning the national flag. Except for us Mandela is an even bigger symbol than the flag. Presumably Damaso understood this, and was looking for the sensationalism his painting would bring.

Is it art? The process of holding a mirror up to ourselves is something I would consider art.

Is it good art? I have no idea.
Well said Brendah. It's time we woke up to the fact that Mandela is not a god or even as some would have us believe, God Him/Herself. He is just a man, a good man certainly but the fact is, when he visits the toilet it smells just the same as when the rest of us do.
The truth is Mandela did not play the great role everyone seems to make out but was a useful, politically-emasculated, smiling puppet trotted out to be the "face" of South Africa. The real power was wielded by Mbeki's and his cronies.
It is embarrassing to see the treatment of the old man nowadays, as the government continues to parade him when it suits them and his wife, it would appear has to tell him when to wave or smile. Give him a break and let him maintain his dignity.
The autopsy picture is useful because my guess is, when he dies, the government is going to embalm him, seal him in a glass case and put him on show somewhere. (Actually I'm kidding about that but wouldn't be totally surpised if it did happen)
My blog: www.thewhiteou.com