Defend Truth

ANALYSIS

DD ‘Destiny Denied’ Mabuza — it is cold outside the ANC factions’ warm embrace

DD ‘Destiny Denied’ Mabuza — it is cold outside the ANC factions’ warm embrace
Deputy President David Mabuza faces a cabinet reshuffle in which he will be replaced as Deputy President. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

Predominantly, this is a story of constituencies and the importance of national, broad-based support, and how easily the mirage of strong followership can melt under the gaze of the party nomination process.

Last week came confirmation that, barring the biggest of political shocks, Deputy President David Mabuza will not be in the ANC’s top six national leadership after the ANC’s elective conference next month. This is in stark contrast to what appeared to be his strong position just five years ago, when he appeared to hold the balance of power in the ANC. It may well be that this kingmaking power and the way he exercised it have led to his apparent abandonment.

There are other factors that contributed to Mabuza’s loss of national power, including what has happened in Mpumalanga since 2017, what may have been the artificial nature of politics in that province, and his own conduct in the role of Deputy President, both of the party and the state.

His fall could well be a salutary lesson for the man who appears destined to take his position, the current ANC treasurer and Gauteng strongman, Paul Mashatile.

It is difficult now to remember just how potent Mabuza was five years ago. It is generally accepted that without his intervention, Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma would have won the ANC presidency. This would have led to the continued supremacy of Jacob Zuma’s faction, and a likely party split. It would have also been coupled with massive social turmoil as a result of the continuation of Gupta-aligned control of South Africa just as the #GuptaLeaks laid bare most of their crimes.

It was this central positioning that forced the CR17 campaign to make Mabuza Deputy President. Mabuza even had the power to force Ramaphosa to postpone his Cabinet announcement.

This was the same Mabuza who took an active part in public debate.

He memorably scolded Ace Magashule for using government money to hold a farewell event for himself in a Bloemfontein stadium.

He gave a powerful speech at a farmers’ event, sounding like an impressive national leader when he said: “It is understandable that human beings are prone, in times of national strife, in times of bitter socioeconomic hardship, in times of hard debates about land reform, to retreat easily into narrow nationalist, racial and ethnic enclaves… However, I stand in front of you on this day to state with conviction that this path we have chosen is the correct one.”

This is a far cry from the Mabuza of today.

Hiding from the public eye

He went on to almost hide from the public eye. Perhaps the biggest headlines he has sparked in recent times have been about a second car accident suffered by his VIP convoy, in which one guard lost his life.

Predominantly, this is a story of constituencies and the importance of national, broad-based support, and how easily the mirage of strong followership can melt under the gaze of the party nomination process.

This goes back to how Mabuza achieved the power he appeared to have in 2017, which was mostly based on the surprisingly high (some would say Potemkin) number of ANC branches in Mpumalanga.

In 2012, Mpumalanga had the fifth-highest number of branches in the ANC, and in 2017 it “grew” massively, all the way to the second-highest, just behind the KZN (which had its own massive growth in the race for a million members in time for the ANC’s 100th birthday, and which also magically benefited the then president, Jacob Zuma — Ed). Now, in 2022, it again has the fifth-highest.

It is clear now this was all as fake as IOL headlines.

At the same time, while he had often been described as a provincial “strongman”, once he left the province for the national office, Mabuza lost his grip on branches there.

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

In his absence, almost suddenly, it appeared as if there were four factions in the ANC in Mpumalanga.

Mabuza suddenly had no clear and committed constituency, and his backing eroded. This movement away from him may also be related to his decision to back Ramaphosa five years ago. It gave a strong impression that he had betrayed what was called the Premier League, which backed Dlamini Zuma.

This was unforgivable.

Strangely, for those who benefited from the 2017 Nasrec result, it may be because Mabuza did the right thing that year, that he is suffering now.

To add to this is what appears to be the difficulty that provincial ANC leaders experience when they move to national politics.

Mabuza is not alone in this problem. Magashule was also a provincial strongman who did not last long in national politics, and Zweli Mkhize went from provincial politics to the position of ANC treasurer in 2012, but lasted only one term (and even now, the vast majority of his support for the position of ANC leader still comes from KZN).

A lack of achievements and visits to Russian doctors

But there is also Mabuza’s behaviour.

It is hard to think of one achievement that he can point to as Deputy President.

This is despite having what was claimed to be political authority over two of the biggest problems of our times: the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out and Eskom.

The roll-out happened, it seemed, without him.

The Eskom crisis kept rolling on with him doing nothing to stop it.

And then there is his health.

As has been previously stated, it is probably impossible to accurately assess the impact of this, but he has said that he has visited Russia several times for medical treatment. Despite being asked questions about this in Parliament, he has resolutely refused to explain what the treatment is for, or why doctors in Russia are so much more effective than doctors in South Africa.

It is easy to imagine what would happen if, for example, a leader of the DA went to the US for medical treatment, how there would be claims that this was proof that the opposition was funded by or in debt to the CIA. Needless to say, it is a massive strategic threat to South Africa that the man who’s one heartbeat away from the presidency is in such debt to a superpower, especially an aggressive one that is spreading its tentacles all over Africa.

Guarded nature of his answers

There is also the incredibly guarded nature of his answers to parliamentary questions. He has almost always stuck rigidly to a pre-written script. When asked supplementary questions he has said almost nothing substantive.

Mabuza has taken every opportunity to answer questions virtually rather than in person. While he has the right to do this, answering questions in person signifies that he understands and accepts the rights of others to ask questions and can provide substantive answers.

Outside Parliament, he has taken questions from journalists only a handful of times. And, as far as is known, he has not conducted a single sit-down broadcast interview with any journalist in the past decade.

While ANC politics does not rely on the media, there is evidence that the way politicians perform in the English-speaking broadcast and online media has become more important in our politics of late. It explains why so many ANC politicians are so happy to do so many interviews.

But not Mabuza. Which may well confirm the suspicions of those who remember how he was able to have a journalist arrested simply for receiving a fax.

It may also reinforce the impression that he does not believe he should be held publicly accountable.

However, it should also be remembered that, with the exception of Thabo Mbeki, no one has been able to really make a mark while Deputy President.

Jacob Zuma remained virtually silent for much of his time in the position, until he was fired by Mbeki; the same is true of Kgalema Motlanthe (although he may have used his position to pave the way behind the scenes for Ramaphosa’s eventual win in 2017), and Ramaphosa himself made only two really substantive comments during that time (the first was to support Pravin Gordhan when he was accused of fraud, the second to decry Zuma’s Cabinet reshuffle in March 2017).

It seems impossible to imagine the kind of shock necessary for Mabuza to now win a position in the ANC’s top six. And while the party may allow him to finish his term as Deputy President which expires in 2024, it is difficult to see him playing any substantive political role after that. DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    Could the ANC have achieved its demise without him? For sure. Could parliament continue without him? Absolutely. DD the slacker has been the waste of a salary, but then so are most of the politicians who claim to represent us in parly.

    • Roelf Pretorius says:

      Yes, but who voted them in? Us, the voters. So we also have to take some of the responsibility for the mess ourselves.

      • Davis Kate says:

        Roelf, I certainly did not vote for the ANC, so I did not vote for him. “Us” is a bit broad, I’d say.
        And I am certainly not taking any responsibility.

  • Christo Van der Westhuizen says:

    Reason
    Season
    Lifetime

    Three possible timeframes in any relationship.

    In this case the lifetime elitist membership assumption was again, as is so often the case in especially politics, indeed a mirage.

  • Cunningham Ngcukana says:

    I think for the author it is too early to write off DD in the context of ANC money politics. The nomination process is only indicative because Zikalala was nominated as the only candidate for Chairperson in KZN but was beaten from the floor and did not even make it to the PEC. Ntuli to be the Secretary beat the nominee backed by Zuma, a certain Super Zuma from the floor. I have longed warned the author that Ntuli is the candidate to beat despite the fact that he is not on any slate or Province behind him. ANC branches nominate with an eye as to who controls the public purse strings for patronage and will vote differently at conference. This is what makes the ANC conference difficult to predict this year over and above a branch movement that is determined to crown Ntuli as an SG. Also, there is still the bridge of the 30th of November that Cyril must cross with a very strong case against him as sources indicate.
    One has read the City Press saying that DD campaign has no money, and they did not indicate which campaign has money. One believes that candidates would be throwing money in the se last weeks and no campaign intends arriving at the conference bankrupt. In short, there are still a number of variables that are still at play for every position as there is a gap between nominations and the number of delegates eligible to attend the conference.

    • Paul Caiger says:

      Despite who gets into power within the ANC , the outlook for the country does not change. It’s just a process of moving and replacing rotten apples in a septic barrel of putrid water known as the ANC. Only a change in the governing party can rescue SA , not Ntuli , (whoever he is) , Squirrel I’m- a-poser , DD (Dumb and Dumber) or the ZUMA mafia….. Under ANC communism the country cannot progress but will continue to slide into the proverbial role of another failed 3rd world African state. As many people said ” I told you so”. I would love to be proved wrong ! At present all we can say is “Cry the beloved country”.

  • Gavin Brown says:

    Nice job Stephen – someone has to do it !

  • Sue Grant-Marshall says:

    And then of course there is the role played by DD Mabuza in author Rehana Rossouw’s excellent book, ‘ Predator Politics’ and the great land scam in Mpumalanga. That court case seems never to end with DD ducking Fred Daniel’s strong case against him. Let’s not forget that! I refer you to Kevin Bloom’s excellent Daily Maverick article of 7 August 2022.

  • Roelf Pretorius says:

    Of course DD has the case that Fred Daniel made against him (I think it is a civil case though) that is still pending. But we have to give credit where credit is due; fact is that he did support Ramaphosa in 2017 at the conference, and he did convince all his followers to follow suit.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider

Every seed of hope will one day sprout.

South African citizens throughout the country are standing up for our human rights. Stay informed, connected and inspired by our weekly FREE Maverick Citizen newsletter.