Corruption Watch & government's failure to deliver

A lot has been said, and will continue to be said about Cosatu's big push against corruption, and in particular about the establishment of Corruption Watch. It's a good idea, and it's clearly a project whose time has come. But the fact that the biggest union federation in the country, a member of the "ruling" Alliance nogal, feels the need to take this step, tells us many things. It talks about a lack of capacity in government, about how corruption really is the thing that will kill us all. But what it really says is that no one believes government has the capacity, or the will, to fight it. By STEPHEN GROOTES.

Cosatu has always said that it supports the government, that despite obvious differences, it is a fully paid up member of the Alliance. It's also supported President Jacob Zuma almost from the very beginning. For them to now say that, actually, corruption is such a problem that it needs to act alone suggests a complete lack of faith in parts of the ANC. It also seems to suggest that there is no real trust in Zuma's efforts to stamp out the problem. This is complex, and two-sided. Zuma always says that he has signed more proclamations for the Special Investigating Unit, given it more work than any other president. That is true. But at the same time, he obviously tried to neuter it by sacking Willie Hofmeyr and appointing Willem Heath. That didn't work out so well.

We also have to remember that this project was first conceived when it seemed Cosatu in general, and its general-secretary Zwelinzima Vavi in particular, were going through a distinctly difficult phase in their relationship with Zuma. It was just after the federation's central committee (where Zuma was greeted with an icy silence), and it seemed that Cosatu might actually plump for Kgalema Motlanthe. That's changed now, but this project is going ahead anyway.

That's partly because there's been a tacit admission from Cosatu that Zuma was a flawed candidate at Polokwane, but was the only person who could beat Thabo Mbeki. However Cosatu has decided better the devil it knows, and thus it's going to stay the course. This means, however, that they're taking measures to help them to live with him. And this is one.

This brings in another aspect of Cosatu's relationship with the ANC. The Protection of State Information Bill is still in the works, and that bill would seem to be enough to neuter this project almost immediately. So for Cosatu, this project gives them another reason to fight that bill, and to join what will no doubt be a crowded applicant's bench in the Constitutional Court when the time comes.

However, moving away from politics for a moment, this move by Cosatu tells us something else. There is a general trend away from reliance on government to do, well, anything. We can't see government's request for help in fighting corruption in isolation. We have to look at it in the context of the City of Joburg asking for help with fixing roads, or the city's Metro Police asking for more sponsors for traffic light points people. Eskom's problems rate a mention too.

Overall, in all sorts of different ways, government's capacity to deliver is massively eroded, and slowly but surely many aspects are being taken over by capitalists, or individuals.

There's a model for this. In Kenya, it's common to see streetlights "brought to you by" this company or that firm. It's a direct echo of the sponsored solar powered traffic lights on the Grayston off-ramp in Sandton. This is a two-edged sword. On the one side, it's a sign of very real failure on the part of the people we've elected. On the other, hey look, the lights work.

It's fair to expect, in a country with our problems, history and cash flow that there are going to be failures. And there is an argument to be made that says Joburg's northern suburbs can live with a few potholes (and physios, if Discovery can be believed) if all of Soweto is getting tar for the first time. We can't just moan, we have to look at where the money is going. Except that the money is not all going where it should; just look at Limpopo.

In some ways, there's a lot to applaud. It's good that individuals stand up and take responsibility. It's good also that capitalism does more than just make money, by actually doing things in the name of public good. It also helps capitalism make the case that it is, in the end, human.

But the real problem is that we are also giving up on government. There's a sort of hollowing out of the state that is underway – that we send large proportions of our money into a deep black hole, from where it's never seen again. This is not so much the Kenyan model, but the Nigerian model. In the '80's, Nigerians just paid tax and got nothing in return (there was even, would you believe, a tax that was meant to "fight apartheid". Its benefits to the people of South Africa would appear to have gone unrecorded). And they then expected less and less from government. There's a vicious circle here. We all know that if you pay money to the City of Joburg, you have a very small chance of getting it back (as it happens the Auditor-General agrees, by giving the city a qualified audit for problems in its revenue department). As a result, we start to find ways to have very little to do with the municipality, we get pre-paid meters, or even some sort of stand-by generators and water purifiers.

Which all deepens the gap between the haves and haves-not. The ones who have will be able to supplant the government and provide services of their own; soon the biggest crime-deterrent in the country will be the private armies of security personnel. Perhaps even better example is broadcasting. Millions have given up on the SABC and only watch DStv. That fractures us as a nation, when the SABC could be bringing us together. You want us to continue? Check out the private schools' results vs the government-run ones? Health care divide, anyone?

To sum it all up, we're in a situation where, as Ronald Reagan once put it, "Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem". Cosatu seems to almost tacitly admit this. It's a great pity, because government is the one place that should touch everyone in the country. It is simply not. It's failing us. But it's doing it slowly, almost imperceptibly. Which is how justice minister Jeff Radebe could attend Thursday's launch with a straight face. DM

Grootes is an EWN reporter.



Photo: Reuters.

Friday 27 January, 2012
 
Top Stories

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please login or sign up.
A bit like Mrs.Fritzl staying in the relationship and starting an incest watch,
Cosatu need to get out of the relationship and put an end to their corrupt ANC government or stay in and remain complicite.
Secrecy bill will zap them.
justice minister Radebe wouldn't know squat about what does or doesn't constitute failure.
This analysis is flawed, it advances an unsubstantiated point i.e. that some members of government are corrupt cannot be the fault of the ANC, the question is what does the government do when such are exposed. The facts are most of the time it is the government that exposes such people and where evidence have been brought forward government has acted(e.g. Home affairs and DSD has acted against many officials). To say that starting a civic organisation to fight corruption indicates lack of faith in government's intention to fight corruption; is like saying starting a Community Police forum is an indication of lack of faith in the SAP. All crime, and corruption is a crime cannot be fought without the participation of the community, it is the community who report and expose the perpetrators who are then aprehended by the authorities. The people who are corrupt are acting against ANC and government policy they are the enemy of the people and must be isolated and dealt with. To insist that it is the ANC that is corrupt for political reasons(hoping that this will loose them their huge majority) is a double edged sword as it would force those who are defending the ANC to seem like they are defending the corrupt.
Nhlanhla - Your holding up of the Home Affairs ministry as being representative is wrong. They are a welcome exception driven by a minister who is actually demanding and getting performance(similarly Health, Finance, Planning). Almost all the others including the gravy plane(s) president are failures.
Nhlanhla you obviously have no idea how deep this rot runs. I wish people would stop thinking that this is a white vs. black thing. Its not. I want to see these impoverished black kids
with a future just as much as you do. Otherwise I would’ve fled this beautiful third world country long ago. There is, however, endemic corruption
in government. Why else would the most needed paratstals like ESKOM NOT be privatised after the disasters we’ve seen? For what other reason would the
Government hand out chickens at election rallies? For what reason other than corruption do we STILL have the immensely
archaic local government election system which we currently have? There are municipalities with Municipal managers that
have been on paid suspension for months and months on end(and at R2 mil a year, that’s a loooot of money). Comrades
get fingered for corruption but they don’t get fired, they get redemployed. If a guy steals R200 million rand(enough to FEED
hundreds of families, do you think he deserves a slap on the wrist and a new job in a different department or a banishment
from public office? You see if the media fingers such a guy it gets perceived as a white journalist trying to jail a black official
from an often prominent traditional family. Meantime back at the ranch its all statistics, black people make up most of the
sphere of government due to Employment Equity policies so if there is corruption the race group with the most representation
have the highest statistical chance to partake in corruption. There are white corrupt officials as well. Percentage wise, knowing my greedy white brothers, there are
probably more! For the same reason the white journalist can’t find employment in the public sector because he is the wrong
skin colour so he works in the private sector. Has nothing to do with white guy exposing black guy. Unfortunately black
people perceive it this way and this coupled with a personal connection(family or friend) being corrupt coupled with our history
of oppression by whites makes corruption reporting VERY hard for the community. The fact is that due to bad choices made
between ‘93 and’98 by both the NP and ANC coupled with weak leadership we now have a very bad way of trying to set the wrongs of
Apartheid straight. But Vavi is right corruption will devour South Africa (note South Africa, whites or blacks, all of the country) and this
is our first MAJOR test since ’94. If we past this test, South Africa will be a shining beacon in Africa(and perhaps the world) and you
will see the first country succeeding with an African solution. Knowing HUMAN nature, I won’t hold my breath.
...."SOME members of the ANC are corrupt'.......SOME amounts to 90-99% of members cadres. When discovered with the hands in the dough, they object and counterclaim, not with their money of course, but more of the tax-payers, and during all the time they delay to avoid conviction, still receive salaries and perks, and when the scandal is fading, they manage to be "re-deployed" to some other money-milking position inside the syndicate......
.....and why COSATU remains selectively mouth wide closed about the fraud with the pension money from the Textile Workers????........You see, cadres like Godongwana and wife, resign to pursue their interests, they are congratulated by the President for their services to the nation.....Patel does not need to declare anything.....this other chubby Mr Sam Buthelezi refuses to testify, even while in jail.....None are convicted of anything!!...Innocent as newborns!!!!!!!!!................

Why COSATU says nothing about the fantastic Khubuluse Zuma and Mandela's grandson, exudating filthy richness money, but two f@ks about the unpaid for two years miners.........
The concomitant big question is that if you are provding your own rather than using Government services, why pay tax at all? That is the thin edge of another big wedge.

W've seen ratepayers associations asking rate payers in North-west to pay municipal taxes into trust accounts rather than to the Municipality and using that money to pay for independent refuse collection services, security services, guys wot fill in potholes and so-on.

If and when that concept migrates to national taxation, then Government will have to act.
Agreed and thank you. After about 10 years of being shocked and disappointed by our Fong Kong democracy I expect nothing but a a cheerful annual reminder from SARS that South Africans are privileged to pay tax and dare not cheat on their returns.

No more. We must expect and demand the honouring of their part of the contract. Rather spend resources on taking over government duties, we should enforce our rights.

Kenya's corruption is as systemic as Nigeria, perhaps not as overtly crude. In Nairobi suburbs collectively fund private contractors on top of paying for city refuse removal. Once the precedent is set it is irreversible and contagious.

In Joburg civil protest through petitions and objections amount to nothing, even when council breaks their own by-laws.How disheartening! Our protests will have to be customised for its audience. A fracas, a media storm, a burning tyre.

But all of this will only be protesting the symptoms. The morbidly obese party list system needs every citizen's attention. Unless it is replaced with a proper democratic voting system, we will run out of steam. We need to get the root of the problem.
Here's a suggestion to DM. Can you put up a "What-if?" page? The "what-if" scenario would be something like "Name the SA government you'd like to see". It could run along the lines of electing a world 11 in cricket, or in soccer, a world XV in rugby... You get my drift?

Let me put it this way: Thuli Madonsela for president: I vote aye. Trevor Manuel for minister of finance: I vote aye. Lindiwe Mazibuko as speaker: I vote aye. David Maynier as minister of defence: I vote nay. ... Why not? Stephen Grootes as minister of communications: I'll vote aye.

This is an ice-breaker post. Perhaps it's not achievable. Perhaps it is. And let's not forget the technocrats - they have something to offer to the country.

And I believe that Gordhan should be there as well, as a Major minister.

And I've never voted ANC - I go only where I feel accolade is due, and unfortunately my list is short.

What about it DM? Create an app that reflects the choice of an informed electorate? Let's see where it goes?

No?

Why not?

Sean Cannon. You are on to something here. DM will have constructed the perfect theoretical party. Expressing a 'what if' reality is often not far beyond reality. If only innovation in professional politics were as robust as in business. Someone has got to start asking why not.
I am singularly amazed that more poor communities have not taken action against their councils and actually put solutions in place themselves. In fact, that is what we will all have to do. Work together to sort out the problems and put all rates payments into trust accounts to pay for the work that needs doing. Then we vote out our councillors en masse at the next election by refusing to vote for anyone at all