Reporter's notebook: Siyanqoba shows off ANC popularity and Zuma's mind-numbing speech

The ANC likes to party. And why not? When you have the resources to take over the FNB Stadium you may have something to celebrate. And it’s best to have the party now, because you may not feel like partying later. So if you’re the ANC, it’s best to party like it’s 1994. By STEPHEN GROOTES, who manages not once in his entire report to use the word “toilet”, not even once.

We may sound a little boring about this, but the FNB Stadium is world-class. Deep in the bowels of the structure, near where the television trucks hang out, there are miles of corridors. The well-lit passageways are lined with hooks every few metres. It’s so that you can lay literally miles of TV cable and not get anything snagged. Once you’re up in the media section, you realise those little rooms are actually commentary booths, and in one of them a couple of Spaniards were rather excited last year.

At 8:00 in the morning, Fikile Mbalula was getting a little excited too. He had the world’s biggest PA system to play with, and he wasn’t going to give up the power of the microphone easily. He was in a jovial mood, joking about keeping people off the grass because, “as sports minister you’re costing me a lot of money”. It’s interesting that despite the suggested sidelining of his role during these elections (he pretty much ran the ANC’s campaign in 2009), he’s still the partier-in-chief.

It is perhaps an indication of the increasing influence of the ANC Youth League that the political side of this event started late. By the time President Jacob Zuma got going, he was two hours and 18 minutes behind schedule. Not that that forced the SABC to break away from its coverage in any way. So how does one fill the time? Well, you bug politicians.

And perhaps the most interesting was Ngoako Ramathlodi. He’s deputy correctional services minister these days, but he’s also serving his second stint as ANC election head (He filled the same post in 2009. Confused about his and Mbalula's roles? Us too. Ramathlodi is “head of elections” and Mbalula is “head of campaigns”. Clear? No, we didn’t think so either). He often comes across as a little defensive with the media. He’s had a rough ride, unsubstantiated corruption allegations hung around him for years and he was never someone who took that lying down. But he was in a pretty expansive mood. When asked what had changed in this election compared to last, he said, “the people are now holding us to account, as they should… it’s not enough any more to say we liberated you”. When pressed on whether that makes it harder for the ANC to campaign, “well, of course, but if you want to lead you must earn your stripes”.

This is a fascinating insight from the bloke who actually knows. In essence, it’s a realisation the ANC actually has to operate like a political party, it cannot just be a liberation movement. Despite the fact Zuma always uses the latter definition. It’s also, perhaps, an indication the DA is doing well by concentrating on service delivery. It doesn’t have a history to fall back on, so it works bloody hard at what it has. And what the DA has is beginning to matter. Ramathlodi seemed quite sanguine about it, it’s a fact of life really, and the party will have to get to grips with it.

Eventually, the leaders started arriving on the pitch. Yes, the person who got one of the biggest cheers of the day has the initials J.S.M. But Zuma got even more. That’s not necessarily a sign Zuma is more popular, as he does embody the ANC. Zuma also got to do the lap of honour around the stadium, if it had been Malema, well, the cheers would probably have been much louder. They were certainly disproportionate for the position he holds.

Finally, after some SABC scheduler had lost a bit more hair, things got going. There’s a script to these rallies, the head of the ANC province that’s hosting the event says a few nice things, then there’s messages of support from the leagues and the alliance partners (they’re not introduced, so as to save some from potential embarrassment) and then Zuma gets his chance. It’s a sign of the times that Malema’s five minutes contains far more news than Zuma’s 40.

He was his usual controversial self. There was the “we’ll take back Cape Town from the madam”, the “ANC is the only party that will ensure economic freedom in our lifetime”. Then the hectic stuff. “The DA is a party only for white people, it is not for you. It is a party for minorities, the ANC is for everyone, black and white”. Hmm. It’s the same old strategy, let Malema play the woman and go racial, while Zuma sits back and looks presidential.

Where Malema was really surprising though, was what he said about Zuma. He said he wasn’t going to talk for long, because “our President, will give the main message, the only President, the undisputed President of the oldest organisation on our continent”. Contrast that with what he said in Rustenberg at the start of this campaign, “This is not a democracy of families”, that famous jibe at the Guptas who are close to Zuma.

Clearly, there’s an election on, there’s a script and even Malema dare not stray from it.

Finally, Zuma himself stood up.

Dear reader, it was dreary.

Even the magnificence of the stadium couldn’t make it interesting. It was a litany of what the ANC has achieved in office, its greatest-hits album if you like. How it alone brought electricity and water to millions, how it brought improved telecommunications (and invented the Internet, pushing Al Gore to margins of history) and basically provided heaven on Earth. It was like watching Thabo Mbeki’s address at Polokwane: long, dull and almost totally irrelevant. But perhaps it reminded the voters of why they should vote ANC, and hell, he had a free pass on the SABC in which to do it.

Zuma didn’t spend much time on local government issues, there was the odd mention of potholes and how “people want clean efficient local government”, but it was really a speech about “when we vote on Wednesday, we will be protecting the ANC, and protecting our hard-won freedom”. Yes well, okay if you say so.

A word on the crowd. We’ve said before that one of the first indications of how the ANC will do in these elections will be how it does in getting out the voters, and thus, how successful it is in bringing in people to this rally. The party had claimed it would fill the stadium, there would be a 100,000 people or so. It had set up overflow areas for the extra. In Rustenberg, those areas stood empty as did half the seats. This was different. It was nearly full, not quite, but nearly. There were patches of orange seating that could plainly be seen. Does that mean it’s going to do well or badly then? We’re not sure. It does seem to have lost some of its grip on the electorate. That doesn’t mean it won’t win most of the municipalities on Wednesday. But it does indicate something seems to have changed. The Zuma Tsunami is over. The elation is gone. With it, perhaps, the “we will vote for you no matter what” effect.

It’s foolish to make predictions based on one rally and before people have actually voted. There are several things this election could be remembered for. It’s possible that one of those could be the moment the ANC starts to be judged on its track record and not its history. And that will make our politics very interesting indeed. DM


Grootes is an EWN reporter.

South Africa's President, and President of the African National Congress (ANC), Jacob Zuma waves to his supporters during his arrival for a final rally in Soweto May 15, 2011. South Africans will vote in municipal elections on May 18. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko.

Monday 16 May, 2011
 
Top Stories

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please login or sign up.
Any one else shocked (but a minute after, not shocked - because, hey! that is what the ANC do) that they managed to engineer two hours of SCHEDULED time on SABC? I know the DA is protesting and I have had a feeling (maybe I am biased?!) that everyone has bent over backwards to be balanced and in so doing, criticised the DA far more than what was justified - therefore unbalanced . The toilet saga a case in point. This ONE negative fact which started as a good intention, badly handled, was asked and answered a million times by calm DA campaigners in heroic way. For that alone they should win.
"How it alone brought electricity and water to millions, how it brought improved telecommunications (and invented the Internet, pushing Al Gore to margins of history) and basically provided heaven on Earth" I am battling to understand why the writer of this article regards this statement as being incorrect. Can you please elaborate on this Mr Grootes? I mean this is the only democratic and all-inclusive government we have had in the past 17 years.who else can lay claim to have achieved all of this? hmmm..... the mind boggles. I will be waiting for the response.
Perhaps more to point is the fact that no one will have water or electricity within five years from now because of the unsustainable and corrupt manner in which the ANC buffoonery have run the country. Indeed, with Zooma and his cronies spending money like sailors on shore leave, we shall soon be borrowing money to pay for welfare entitlement and public sector salaries.
Improved Telecoms - despite Neotel and Seacom we have been sliding down the African league table for Net access provision every year. Ethiopia currently has better infrastructure than SA.

Invented the Internet - Tim Berners-Lee is not an ANC member as far as I know.

As others had said, perhaps if we had invested in education rather than tanks and planes to beat off the Swazi hordes intent on annexing KZN, we would be a lot better off.
Before 1994 Eskom was already rolling out electricity to poor black communities. I know for some people that is a hard one to swallow. So mostly they find it easier to ignore it then to have to deal with the complication of black upliftment being addressed pre-1994.
@Kgaogelo this might help to unboggle your mind: no one else has had the opportunity to run the country. The bringing of some basic services would have been achievable by any other organisation with half the number of ministers and hangers-on and no security for any of them. It reminds me of the old monopoly Telkom spending millions on full-page ads telling us that they brought us some major sporting event when no-one else was allowed to.

Luckily for the ANC there is a large number of boggled minds who believe that God and the ancestors will jump out of dark corners to swallow them up if they vote for a party with competence rather than slogans and dark wit-gevaar warnings.

Imagine, if all ministers had forced all their staff to do their jobs properly as did Trevor Manuel, where we might have been today? Instead we watch as the civil service becomes self service for an ever-growing gang of vainglorious, shameless bandits. If the arms deal had been an education deal, we might now have a populace whose minds do not boggle at the obvious and can discriminate between fact and fiction.
@ cliff "no one else has had the opportunity to run the country" given by whom?the apartheid government had over 40 years to provide this "opporunity" you are talking about. let us get our minds out of the gutter and stop being emotional. Apartheid and racial discrimination its all gone. the present government received a mandate from the majority of south africans to improve their lives and yes you do come across "incompetents" and "hanger-ons" something which is not unique in human behaviour but inexcusable.The truth of the matter is (whether you like it or not)that this is the government chosen and trusted by the people to deliver.let us judge it fairly on whether it is delivering or not and stop being petty and emotional by allowing your hatred of the ANC to cloud your thinking..
Kgaogelo its not hatred but disappointment. For as long as I expected better from the ANC, it now turns out that my thinking was clouded. I think that Zuma's comments / admissions on the Eastern Cape says it all.

"The people" were denied decent education by the apartheid gang. There are still mud schools in this country and kids who die from preventable ailments. This after 17 years of liberation. If "the people" had been educated the ANC would be on their way out and other Cope-type parties would be in business already.

The ANC correctly says that "our people" are not stupid. To appeal to the ancestors ire and claim God's support would indicate otherwise. To dismiss me as petty and emotional won't get you around the facts. But it will ensure a longer decline.
@cliff. voting for the ANC has nothing to do with "education" or being "educated". Does my LLD or matric make me a better person than an ordinary blue collar worker?. People are not idiots. they know what apartheid did and they know what the ANC has provided for them in the past 17 years and this is more than "service delivery", it is their dignity and respect as human beings. Yes, it is debatable whether or not the ANC can exclusively lay claim to this as there were other liberation movements and individuals but it cant be denied that it was at the forefront. This is why majority of people will keep voting ANC and not any other party. Yes there is corruption,cryonism, nepotism etc...and the people are seeing this hence the protests that are taking place and rightly so.
@kgaogelo I was of the opinion that the UDF was at the forefront. They were quickly brushed aside by the returning heroes with their degrees and drinking habits.

In my estimation your education has made a difference (not a better person than any other) in that you have never voted for the ANC. Nor would anyone else capable of discerning between a once noble liberation movement and a kleptocracy led by a man whose greatest achievement was to avoid prosecution by becoming president. How do you hold a city official accountable when the guy running the country should be in prison?

Another definition of democracy is 'a system where everyone gets what the majority deserves'. I just think the majority deserves much better given our sad past. I do get your point about the emotional element in voting. I know its not easy to see the bad in something you once held in high esteem. For the record I once voted for Madiba's vision.
You cannot really be serious? " a mandate to improve their lives " - how much of the service delivery protests that take place do you ignore , never mind police brutality and corruption on a scale the same as what we saw throughout the Apartheid era.
Is this government coming close to delivering to the MAJORITY of the people that actually vote for them - the answer to that is a resounding NO!
I might suggest that your thoughts are clouded by a very biased support of the ANC.
@curtis. you will be surprised to know that I have never voted for the ANC which clearly does not make me a supporter. i am just stating the facts thats all. you and I know fully well what will happen on Wednesday- the ANC will get another "mandate" people's lives will be improved. That is a fact. The ANC has been receiving multiple mandates since 1994 to "IMPROVE THE MAJORITY'S LIVES" like it or should isay "hate it or not" this what it has been doing.the question to be asked is whether it is doing enough? this is the question that all of us should be asking rather than denying what is essentially a fact.
Stephen - you're way too nice:
"He’s had a rough ride, unsubstantiated corruption allegations hung around him for years and he was never someone who took that lying down"

un-investigated allegation rather unsubstantiated. And more in the latest issue of Noseweek.


http://www.noseweek.co.za/article/2490/A-word-in-your-ear
It's always comforting, once the election circus rolls into town, to remember the fine words of H.L. Mencken: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard".
Ramathodi not one to take allegations of corruption lying down?

If someone said I had been corruptly creaming monies off the governments budgets for pensions and clandestinely having those monies paid to me via a third party, I would sue (if I was innocent of course). That is essentially what noseweek said. Why did Ramathlodi not sue?

There is a 1,800 square meter house going up in Kyalami. 1,800 square meters is seriously big! Where is the money coming from? A rake off from the national pension payouts, that is where. ANC connection again of course.

Kgaogela, I must disagree. ANC followers are stupid. They must be. How else can you explain their hero worship of arrogant thieves, their support of a party of fraudsters? More than half the people mentioned in Grootes' article have been implicated, convicted of or charged with fraud or corruption.

Once a thief, always a thief, that is my view of the ANC.
@ Ivan
You are being deliberately obtuse, surely no body looks forward to suing, it consumes money and time. Money which if the person is not corrupt and has no money stacked somewhere does not have; time which as a deputy minister is better spent serving South Africa rather than in courts. Now this seems an obvious point to me and only an extremely naïve person would present the litigation processes as something to look forward to.
What do I know though I am going to vote ANC and therefore declared stupid by the wise Ivan. Unbelievable!!!