Analysis: Vavi's 'scorched earth' threat will come back to haunt him

As South Africa sinks deeper into the chaos caused by the public servants' strike and pays a terrible price because of the fight between alliance partners, Cosatu's leadership has chosen to turn up the heat a great deal. This time, however, they themselves are most likely to be the greatest casualties.

On Tuesday, Cosatu’s Zwelinzima Vavi issued a call for the entire trade union federation’s membership to support the public servants’ strike, thus threatening to bring South Africa to a standstill.

"We call on all workers to intensify their action. Every Cosatu-affiliated union must on 26 August submit notice to their employers  to embark on a secondary strike," he said. And yet, we feel Cosatu's leadership is praying that this scare tactic actually works and they don't have to deliver on their dire threat.

To outsiders, this may sound like a sign of a politician unleashing the power at his disposal. To some, this may even sound like good politics, showing who's the most potent force in the country just in time for the ANC national general council meeting in September.

Some months ago, we posed the question of who Cosatu represents. Was it the entire working class, or was it only the employed working class? The consequence being that the working class representatives should work towards growth of a country's economy, while the employed-workers' organisation will forever focus on getting more out of employers. The events of the last 30 days clearly answered our question.

During the Cold War, the US and USSR could have destroyed each other a thousand times over. Of course, and luckily for the rest of the world, they never used their nuclear arsenals, because that would inevitably mean their own mutual destruction. There was plenty of brinkmanship, as during the Berlin occupation, the Cuban missile crisis and the USSR's invasion of Afghanistan, but their leadership always wanted to not lose the game more than it wanted to win at all costs.

As in all brinkmanship, the good strategist will never use all his weaponry. In the modern, 24-hour news world, power is only good if used as a threat, but never actually used. By issuing the “nuclear option” threat of a complete strike, Cosatu is close to showing off every bit of force they have. Should the country somehow manage to survive long enough with a relatively functioning government (which in itself is relative, at best), Cosatu will simply run out of legal options.

Not only would they finally and comprehensively prove that the current strike is not about improving their members' lives, but it would also be a direct confirmation of a desire to be the ultimate political power in South Africa. Should they really “go nuclear”, Cosatu would lose everything they fought hard for over many years. The union federation has managed to attract this country's respect for its anti-corruption drive, it is seen as the part of the Tripartite Alliance (with the ANC and SACP) that could be trusted and its leader has earned respect and admiration for his uncompromising stance against the moral decay that has gripped the ANC since it became the ruling party.

However, it is difficult to like and respect the political force that is playing blind to basic human rights violations committed in its name and that is now officially reprimanding thousands of volunteers for helping save lives in public hospitals.

In a matter of weeks, Cosatu and its affiliates turned from fighters for the betterment of lives into the bullies. And no one likes bullies.

The current ever-escalating crisis could ultimately harm Cosatu's Vavi more than anybody else. He will exit in 2011 and the estimates are that he will be looking for one of the highest positions within the ANC. It will, however, be difficult to sell that to the ordinary, non-Cosatu-aligned ANC membership. It will be nigh impossible to explain that the man who ultimately would be responsible for forcing the country to a grinding halt and possibly resulting violence should be one of the leaders of the new, better South Africa. All his enemies have to do, and there are plenty of them, is show the videos of violence and accounts of intimidation.

So we hope the Cosatu leadership prays these days not to have to make their threat the reality. As we mentioned before, going nuclear, scorching the earth may win the battle, even the war. But it will never win the hearts and minds of the people.
If they don't already know that, Vavi and Cosatu better think about it. Hard.

By Branko Brkic

Photo: The Daily Maverick

Wednesday 25 August, 2010
 
Top Stories

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please login or sign up.
I guess he's using the power base at his disposal, but as you say to what end and what cost? To increase the relative power of the labor movement within the alliance and to position himself for a very senior government job, post Zuma? The moral boundaries the strikers seem to over-step are just the same sort of things the masses used to do in the struggle days. The culture remains...
Th thinking in your piece is based (wrongly I think) on the assumption that ANC's electorate and provincial structures have a memory of events going back more than a year. Even Vavi's wholesale allegiance to Zuma has been shortlived. ANC has time and again shown that what matters in gaining positions of leadership within it hinges on 1. who offers the most bread coupons today, 2. who (officially) toes the ANC line of the day and 3. if you have struggle credentials points 1 or 2 matters less.

I think Vavi will make any sour memories from his COSATU leadership disappear swiftly by once again shifting the focus onto his pet projects; corrupt politicians, fighting backwards ANC initiatives, change of economic/fiscal policies, etc. The day the strike is over, you will see hand-shaking, smiles, baby-kissing and all will go back to 'normal'....until this time next year...
When a broad political movement such as the Tripartite Alliance claims to represent everyone, it actually represents no-one.

It's a fantastic system. You can have people like Tokyo Sexwale criticising the move to muzzle the media, while others, such as Blade Nzimande, encouraging it.

The Tripartite Alliance cleverly suppresses differences of ideology, politics and policy because the benefits (money, power) of participating in government are far more important for the individuals and groups concerned.

Just a few days ago I was in Johannesburg and sat down for dinner with a large group of people who advocated the idea that Vavi would 'pull the ANC back on course, pursue corrupt individuals, etc'. They said the same things about Zuma when he was inaugurated.

Vavi is a populist of the worst kind. Careful what you wish for.
I think you got it all wrong, Vavi is not positioning himself for a position in the ANC, this is how the MDC was formed in Zim. Strain the relations with the ruling party, with which you are in alliance to a breaking point, then form a movement that eventually contest elections. That is were COSATU is going. Zuma and the ANC are aware of this, hence they are accusing COSATU of behaving like an opposition.
Hi Mohale, I must have missed something so could you please point out to me when this accusation was leveled at Cosatu.

It is my believe that all this smoke and mirrors, better known as a 'kop smokkel' here in the Cape, is just that. They are hiding behind all this whilst performing some sleigh of hand to get unpopular legislation onto the statute books.

I think Mohale is right. Vavi is not acting like someone trying to secure a future in the ANC, but more like someone trying to build his own political momentum. As others have pointed out the alliance papers over the most incredible internal contradictions, since it is not united around any of the major policy choices facing SA.

We are at an interesting point where the alliance is left without objectives, but where it has so much historical cohesion that it will take an earthquake to break it.

This strike looks like Vavi trying to provoke the earthquake that will split the alliance.
Do you think most ANC voters take note of what goes on, to that extent? I don't believe the people who cheered Vavi for his anti-corruption stance are amongst them.