In-your-face movie awaits Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is facing a personal privacy crisis of his own after a leaked script reveals that The Social Network – the movie of his life – is set to portray him as a socially awkward sex maniac.

May has been a mensis horribilis for Mark Zuckerberg with the über-geek’s birthday month bringing nothing but trouble. Facebook announced the social network’s new privacy policy to a stinging reception from US Senators and the media. Fifteen privacy groups filed with the Federal Trade Commission and there was the massive backlash from Facebook users who promised a mass exodus. A number of security breaches at Facebook only served to further erode the brand’s standing with its 400 million users.

As if all that wasn’t bad enough, an instant message exchange between Zuckerberg and a former university friend revealed that the Facebook founder had referred to early users of Facebook as “Dumb fucks”. According to Business Insider the following exchange took place between 19-year-old Zuckerberg and an unnamed friend shortly after Zuckerberg launched Facebook from his dorm:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don’t know why.

Zuck: They “trust me”

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

But that little PR spectacle pales into insignificant in the face of news from The Times that October will see the release of the movie of Zuckerberg’s short life and times, which will be a publicity headache of blockbuster proportions.

The Times got hold of a draft copy of the screenplay of The Social Network, which has been written by Aaron Sorkin of The West Wing and A Few Good Men fame, and news is that it is brutal. Based on Ben Mezrich’s 2009 book The Accidental Billionaires, Sorkin portrays Zuckerberg as a ruthless, conniving, almost autistic, untrustworthy sex maniac. The movie will be directed by David Fincher, famous for Fight Club.

While it’s moderately simple to spin doctor your way through a privacy crisis, a major motion picture is a completely different calibre of PR pain. Unlike news and burgeoning content that is here today, gone tomorrow, successful films enter our cultural consciousness for sustained periods of time. There’s the pre-publicity blitz, the red carpet walks, the interviews, the reviews, the releases in different territories across the world and the fact that all this happens in the mainstream media. Up to now Facebook media coverage has had a much stronger business or technology slant. The movie will take Zuckerberg and Facebook into hardcore, in-your-face consumer territory.

The Times reports that Zuckerberg is horrified about the current negative publicity surrounding him, and that he desperately wants to be positioned as a “good guy”. So desperate is he to control his image that Facebook has an entrenched policy that disallows employees from participating in gossip about the social media giant’s founders.

As Zuckerberg moves closer to October he’ll feel the full glare of the world’s media on him, discussing the most intensely personal parts of his life. Like his break up with his college girlfriend Erica which reads like this in the draft movie script:

MARK: I don’t need friends.

ERICA: I was being polite, I have no intention of being friends with you.

MARK: You’re really leaving.

ERICA takes MARK’s hand and looks at him tenderly...

ERICA (close): Listen. You’re going to be successful and rich. But you’re going to go through life thinking that girls don’t like you because you’re a tech geek. And I want you to know, from the bottom of my heart, that that won’t be true. It’ll be because you’re an asshole.”

We can’t wait to see the Facebook fan page for that.

By Mandy de Waal


Read the Times Online article, look through the cast and crew of The Social Network on IMDB. Read Facebook to tweak privacy settings, says Zuckerberg in The Guardian. Read Mark Zuckerberg’s column From Facebook, answering privacy concerns with new settings in The Washington Post.

Main photo: Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO and founder laughs outside the Sun Valley Inn in Sun Valley, Idaho July 9, 2009. The resort is the site for the annual Allen & Co's media and technology conference. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

Watch Mark Zuckerberg being interviewed by TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington:

Watch Mark Zuckerberg talk on the three keys of Facebook’s success. Interview by Henry Blodget

Watch Mark Zuckerberg talk about Facebook’s early days. Interview by Henry Blodget.

Tuesday 25 May, 2010
 
Top Stories

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please login or sign up.
A 19-year-old Ivy League sophomore isn't going to be a sex-obsessed dickhead? So it ain't so, Joe!
I don't understand what the fuss is about. Facebook users do so because they wish to use a professionally made social platform to interact with each other. They do so because it is their choice. They can choose and use privacy settings to regulate their privacy settings. They can terminate their account anytime. It is userfriendly, cheap, revolutionary (I am no expert) and hugely successful. And that is where the problem comes in: lots of little mediocre unsuccessful people having the chance to tear apart a successful young man. And because it is the USA, it has to be Sex, that is used to publicly crucify and humiliate the man AND simultaneously place a slur on his successful businessidea. And from this account it is definitely a campaign to get at the business by slandering the man.Quote: "We can’t wait to see the Facebook fan page for that."

I suspect another agenda: governments and powers that be , fear an open source society, one that agrees not to have secrets. The idea of transparency is frightening and unthinkably foreign to us because we are so brainwashed into believing there should be secrecy in public matters: money, tenders, appointments..... The Interweb/net is fast eroding this outdated concept that in essence protects and serves only the upper ten percent of haves who have a lot to hide from the 90% havenots. The agenda is to further entrench secrecy in legislation , to counteract a groundswell in civil society who demand transparency. (And before you think I am a complete nut, do yourself the favour of checking out Sweden: transparency works! Since 1766. Total transparency could be the only solution for our ailing, failing and greedily corrupt society.)
I have little sympathy with anyone stupid enough to hand over sensitive private data to the likes of Facebook. That said, there is vast difference between non-secret governance and a world where the the company that makes the curtains for your house can, at the push of a button, make them go transparent.